Notes for October 2023 (10/6/2023)
Participants:
Sumreen Asim - Elementary Science Curator
Steven Greenstein - Math Curator
Ryan Novitski - Engineering Curator
Liz Whitewolf - Technology Curator
Glen Bull - P.I. / Curator at Large
Andrea Borowczak - ASTE President
Jo Watts - Director, Make to Learn Lab
Cheryl Bai - Coding: Front End (CAD Library Interface)
Rishi Mukherjee - Coding: Back End (i.e., Dataverse)
-
OpenFlexure Microscope: Andrea met with Richard Bowman, P.I. of the OpenFlexure microscope initiative at the University of Glasgow. Richard demonstrated the OpenFlexure microscope; Andrea has a video of the demonstration. Richard was pleased to meet Andrea, and reiterated that he is looking forward to working with her to adapt the microscope for use in schools. Andrea has identified a teacher in the Orlando area who will pilot the microscope in her biology class once the school adaptation of the microscope is completed.
-
Scale: Andrea raised a question related to the issue of scale during the pilot implementation phase of the CAD Library. There was agreement that it would be better to focus on a small number of objects while process is being piloted.
-
Teacher Survey: Sumreen noted that it would important to survey teachers and to be sure that we are responsive to their needs.
-
Pinhole Projector: Steven Greenstein is going to work with Sumreen and Gerald Knezek to work through the process of entering the data and associated fabrication files into a Dataverse record. This pilot process will be used to inform decisions and recommendations about future directions.
-
Submission Process: For the first year or two of operation, it is likely that curators will need to solicit entries for submission to the CAD Library. This will enable us to control the number of objects that are acquired and review during the initial pilot phases. … Once revisions to this process have been made as needed, Cheryl Bai will develop a submission form that can be used by authors to enter information about objects that are being submitted for review.
-
Review Process: The review process will involve two steps:
First the objects must be replicated by someone other than the developer. Often this will be someone other than the teacher, such as a high school engineering student working with a teacher, a local Fab Lab collaborating with a school, or someone working in a makerspace in a nearby university.
After the object successively fabricated, with any revisions to the CAD files or assembly instructions made as required for successful replication, a teacher will pilot use of the object in instruction. This process will be used to make revisions to instructional supports (such as lesson plans, videos, etc.) as required.
Once the steps of (1) successful replication and (2) class use have been completed with revisions made as needed, the object can then be published in the library.
Note: Until an object is published, reviewers will be able to access the object in the Dataverse through use of a private URL generated for the review process.